Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
10 messages Options
Timmo Timmo
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

I have used my BCU card with Ardilla (Acorn Skiff.) Never had a quibble from a lock keeper yet.

Two years ago I wrote to the BCU asking for clarification of what the card covers both with regard to the waterways licence and their insurance. I suggested that since the waterways licence category is unpowered craft under 20ft then their card should cover all craft in that category (since there are canoes that are rowed and peddled, dinghies that are paddled and electric outboards to add to the mix.

I was promised a reply. Despite following up every few months, and each time having been promised a response, they've never answered the question.

So I carry on using the card until someone tells me otherwise!

Tim


On 26 Jul 2017, at 13:36, Paul (admin) [via UK HBBR Forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Does the British Canoe Union treat rowboats as canoes? I scanned their website but could not find an answer.

If they don't, is there an equivalent rowboat union that offers similar benefits, i.e. free access to 5000km of waterways and group insurance?

-Paul


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://uk-hbbr-forum.967333.n3.nabble.com/Does-the-BCU-treat-rowboats-count-as-canoes-tp4030276.html
To start a new topic under General Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from UK HBBR Forum, click here.
NAML

inwe inwe
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

Its a very good question; when is a canoe not a canoe? Does beam come into the
equation. For example a 'sailing' canoe with a beam of just over 4 feet? Open canoes
of course have a larger beam than kayaks.
Richard
GregHBBR GregHBBR
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

In reply to this post by Timmo
Hi Timmo,
Timmo wrote
Two years ago I wrote to the BCU asking for clarification of what the card covers both with regard to the waterways licence and their insurance.
I have just asked the same question (before I saw your post) mentioning both sailing and rowing as methods of propulsion.

In my email I noted that there is reference to SUP (Stand Up Paddleboards) as a craft that is covered under the BCU licence on many waterways. The phrase most regularly used is "canoe or kayak". Hull shape or size gets no mention anywhere that I can find and the only method of propulsion mentioned seems to be "paddle".

It seems to me that it is a deliberate policy of the BCU not to define its terms as that is likely to lead to difficulties in the arrangements negotiated with so many of the bodies they have to work with and the historic nature of so many navigation rights which all date to days before pleasure boating.
Greg Chapman
GregAfloat - My Boating Biography
Timmo Timmo
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

With regards to the waterways licence I'm happy that it's vague. 

My concern is greater with regard to the third party insurance cover... while lock keepers may tend on the side of flexible interpretation of the words 'canoe' and 'kayak' it's my experience that insurance companies are rather inclined to find reasons to avoid paying. Can imagine the definition one day being tested in court after an accident and claim. 

Tim.


On 27 Jul 2017, at 01:31, GregHBBR [via UK HBBR Forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

Hi Timmo,
Timmo wrote
Two years ago I wrote to the BCU asking for clarification of what the card covers both with regard to the waterways licence and their insurance.
I have just asked the same question (before I saw your post) mentioning both sailing and rowing as methods of propulsion.

In my email I noted that there is reference to SUP (Stand Up Paddleboards) as a craft that is covered under the BCU licence on many waterways. The the phrase most regularly used is "canoe or kayak". Hull shape or size gets no mention anywhere that I can find and the only method of propulsion mentioned seems to be "paddle".

It seems to me that it is a deliberate policy of the BCU not to define its terms as that is likely to lead to difficulties in the arrangements negotiated with so many of the bodies they have to work with and the historic nature of so many navigation rights which all date to days before pleasure boating.
Greg Chapman
GregAfloat - My Boating Biography



If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://uk-hbbr-forum.967333.n3.nabble.com/Re-Does-the-BCU-treat-rowboats-count-as-canoes-tp4030277p4030280.html
To start a new topic under General Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from UK HBBR Forum, click here.
NAML

Paul H (admin) Paul H (admin)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

Timmo wrote
My concern is greater with regard to the third party insurance cover... while lock keepers may tend on the side of flexible interpretation of the words 'canoe' and 'kayak' it's my experience that insurance companies are rather inclined to find reasons to avoid paying. Can imagine the definition one day being tested in court after an accident and claim.
In a narrow lock, a paddling rowboat is unlikely to inflict damage on a huge boat made of steel or glass fibre with significant tonnage. I think the legal case is to take a paddle and use it when appropriate, for safe control of the "canoe".

Conversely using oars or electric drive can get your "canoe" out of trouble - away from a fast weir quickly, or to effect a rapid change of direction. The bye-laws of the river/canal might kick in, justifying the more powerful propulsion on safety grounds.

-Paul
Chris Waite Chris Waite
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

In reply to this post by Timmo
I seem to remember we have been round this buoy before

And one of us (?me) phoned the BCU and were told that rowing boats don't count as canoes, even long thin ones and as far as I remember there is no other centralized body that issues even a partial blanket licence.  Particularly, the Inland Waterways Association are having far too much fun quibbling with the various smaller authorities to actually produce anything so pertinent to our baby boats.

I guess two things come out of this; firstly get your own insurance - Noble Marine for me and secondly, we probably need to be careful what we wish for, as there are any number of bureaucrats out there, egged on with a final flourish of the Eurocracy, that would only be too pleased to have all small boats licenced before use.

Feel free to do more research

Joy to the World

CW  
Jeremy Jeremy
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

I very strongly suspect that CW is right.  

There is an EU definition of a canoe, which is within the RCD, and it specifically refers to a small vessel propelled by a paddle or paddles, not oars, sail or other means of propulsion.  I'm near-certain that the BCU insurer would take the view that the definition within the RCD is the one that would be applied.

When it comes to bodies that licence the use of waterways, then I would hazard a guess that they aren't really that bothered one way or the other.  If someone has what looks like a valid form of licence then the chances are it will be accepted, I think.
Timmo Timmo
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Does the BCU treat rowboats count as canoes?

That's a useful reference point Jeremy. Nearest thing to a legal definition anyone's yet come up with.

But it does leave those in a Hobie Kayak (named as such by the manufacturer/supplier) using a Mirage Drive in a curious position. I suppose the Mirage Drive is a 'paddling' device. But the EU definition is clearly not in line with current technology. 

And anyway, we're leaving the EU, so I wonder what our relationship with the RCD will be in a few years.

As I said, it will get sorted in court one day, hopefully not involving any of us!


Just to be mischevious...

There is a Coleman canadian canoe fitted with a sliding seat and outriggers that is rowed on the Hamble. Should it no longer be called a canoe? 

And if I take a whaler out with a dozen people who propel it with paddles, does it then become a canoe?

And if those dozen people stand and paddle, using the oars but ignoring the rowlocks, does that mean the oars have become paddles?

And if I put a paddle in a rowlock and row with it, is it still a paddle? Am I paddling or rowing?

And when a canoeist hoists a sail, does the boat cease to be a canoe until the sail is dropped. Or if the wind drops and they then paddle (with the sail still up) is it a canoe until the wind picks up again? So is a dinghy propelled by a paddle when becalmed now a canoe?

And is a Dragon Boat a small craft? It's definitely propelled by paddles but at 30ft or more long it doesn't seem to fit the EU description. So what is it? The Royal Canoe Club calls them canoes.


Wot larks!

My son's partner is a barrister, this is the sort of thing she gets big bucks to argue about.

Tim.


On 27 Jul 2017, at 11:34, Jeremy [via UK HBBR Forum] <[hidden email]> wrote:

I very strongly suspect the CW is right.  

There is an EU definition of a canoe, which is within the RCD, and it specifically refers to a small vessel propelled by a paddle or paddles, not oars, sail or other means of propulsion.  I'm near-certain that the BCU insurer would take the view that the definition within the RCD is the one that would be applied.

When it comes to bodies the licence the use of waterways, then I would hazard a guess that they aren't really that bothered one way or the other.  If someone has what looks like a valid form of licence then the chances are it will be accepted, I think.


If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://uk-hbbr-forum.967333.n3.nabble.com/Re-Does-the-BCU-treat-rowboats-count-as-canoes-tp4030277p4030284.html
To start a new topic under General Discussion, email [hidden email]
To unsubscribe from UK HBBR Forum, click here.
NAML

GregHBBR GregHBBR
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Fwd: Re: Definition of Canoe

In reply to this post by Timmo

Not sure if any of the graphics will arrive on the forum!

But here's the response I have just got!



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Definition of Canoe
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:46:29 +0100
From: Chris Page [hidden email]
To: Greg Chapman [hidden email]



Hi Greg

Thanks for your email. There are a few ways to define a 'canoe' or 'canoeing'!

Strictly speaking when it comes to the vessel itself, as a general rule (which of course has some exceptions!) a canoe is something you paddle with a single-bladed paddle, sitting slightly raised from the floor of the boat or kneeling. A kayak is paddled with a double-bladed paddle, generally sitting more directly on the bottom of the boat. A SUP is a bit clearer, and all in the name!

When it comes to our licence and insurance for members we cover for paddlesports - including canoe, kayak, SUP, rafts etc. There is a general need for the person to be 'paddling' - using a paddle. We don't cover, for example, rowing or row boats, or any powered craft (even if it is a canoe with a small outboard).

Canoe-Sailing is a recognised discipline within canoeing however - many people use a sail specially designed to be used in craft like open-Canadian canoes. So this activity is covered by us. Mostly someone canoe-sailing would also have a paddle with them, and would be mixing their sail/paddle through the day, using both at times. It would need to be a canoe that is being sailed however, rather than a different type of sail-boat.

There is a great club called the Canoe Sailing Club, who specialise in sailing canoes, with lots of very helpful members.

I hope that makes sense, but please feel free to contact us for any more advice.



Chris Page
Waterways & Environment Manager

Tel: 0115 896 8837

Mobile: 07794 051286
Email: [hidden email]

National Water Sports Centre, Adbolton Lane, Holme Pierrepont, Nottingham, NG12 2LU  
www.britishcanoeing.org.uk



On 26 July 2017 at 15:46, Greg Chapman <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I can't find a definition of a canoe on your site - although I did find
reference to Stand Up Paddleboards being included in the definition for
some purposes.

I ask as a home boat builder friend is wondering if a boat of similar
dimensions as a canoe could be rowed or sailed and still be covered
under your insurance and waterways licensing arrangements.

Greg






British Canoeing is registered in England as a company limited by guarantee without a share capital. Registered office: National Water Sports Centre, Adbolton Lane, Holme Pierrepont, Nottingham, NG12 2LU. Registered company number 1525484. VAT no 347364441. This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or individuals to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of British Canoeing or its subsidiaries. If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe that you have received this email in error.

Greg Chapman
GregAfloat - My Boating Biography
Paul H (admin) Paul H (admin)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Fwd: Re: Definition of Canoe

GregHBBR wrote
British Canoeing wrote:

There is a great club called the Canoe Sailing Club, who specialise in
sailing canoes, with lots of very helpful members.
Graham, Chris IV and myself have met the Open Canoe Sailing Group at Barton. Some are into boat building like us and they are a friendly, adventurous group.
This guy has built a Paul Fisher Prospector like Phil did, but turned it into a trimaran with 5m of sail and a 2.5hp outboard for emergencies!

http://www.ocsg.org.uk/members-boats/steve-c/

They seem to go for beams of about 36in or 0.9m, then add outriggers to avoid repeated capsizes. Whereas the Bee has a beam of 1.3m, more freeboard and stable when swamped. Plus you can stand up and scratch your bum (Chris Partridge's standard rule!).

So, a bit more suitable for us, but no special arrangements for river or canal licensing.

-Paul